![revenge of the sith revenge of the sith](https://film-grab.com/wp-content/uploads/photo-gallery/Star_Wars_Revenge_of_the_Sith_004.jpg)
The late critic Pauline Kael once dismissed Wars as “an epic without a dream.” I disagree.
![revenge of the sith revenge of the sith](http://static3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070917191946/starwars/images/8/88/RevengeOfTheSithNovel.jpg)
Even with a reported polish by - say it isn’t so - British playwright Tom Stoppard, the words are leaden, faux literate, mock-Shakespearean and devoid of humor.
#Revenge of the sith movie
Until the last half-hour, when Lucas actually does establish a emotional connection between the landmark he created in 1977 and the prequel investment portfolio he laid out in 1999, the movie is one spectacularly designed letdown after another. We justified the thudding lifelessness (a pox on those Jedi councils) by praising Lucas’ digital artistry and nurturing the hope that Revenge of the Sith would spin our heads around with the dark magic of Darth Vader. We watched with stifled yawns as Anakin grew from a snot-nosed kid (Jake Lloyd) to a whiny teen lover boy and wanna-be Jedi (Christensen). That’s why you, me and everyone we know lined up for 1999’s juvenile The Phantom Menace and 2002’s atrocious Attack of the Clones. All three of those movies belong in my personal time capsule, despite the Ewok blight on the last one.
#Revenge of the sith series
There is enormous goodwill built up by the original series Lucas began in 1977 with Wars: A New Hope, continued in 1980 with The Empire Strikes Back and ended in 1983 with Return of the Jedi.
#Revenge of the sith tv
There are reasons: Sith is the last time Lucas will ever skywalk with the Skywalkers on the big screen (talk persists of a TV spinoff). I kept thinking how much better Sith would play as a silent film, with only Chewbacca allowed to do his Wookiee growl and John Williams to trumpet his recycled score.nd yet, Revenge of the Sith is the movie that will do more business (my guess is $400 million-plus), sell more popcorn and brainwash more audiences than any blockbuster this summer. The minute any character - human or droid - opens a mouth to speak, your eyes glaze over. To hear Anakin and his pregnant wife, Senator Padme (the vivacious Natalie Portman rendered vacant), discuss their marriage - a secret that could get Anakin defrocked as a Jedi - is to redefine stilted for a new millennium. In this heretic’s opinion, Sith is a stiff, brought down by that special knack Lucas has of turning flesh-and-blood actors into cardboard cutouts. But thematic darkness is no excuse for dimness in all other departments, except the visual. Heralded for its savagery (my God, it’s rated PG-13), the film follows Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen - to merely call him wooden is an affront to puppets everywhere) as he loses his limbs and his conscience and takes on the evil mantle of Darth Vader. So have several critics, if you go by early reviews. Fan boys, of course, have convinced themselves otherwise. Because that’s the only way you can totally enjoy Revenge of the Sith - the final and most futile attempt from skilled producer, clumsy director and tin-eared writer George Lucas to create a prequel trilogy to match the myth-making spirit of the original Wars saga he unleashed twenty-eight years ago.